| Useful Advices |
Hubs | Hubbers | Topics | Request |
| #1 in Business | Subscribe Email Print |
|
You are here: Home > Business > Workplace Communication > The High Cost of Poor Listening |
|
Useful Advices - The High Cost of Poor Listening
At about 3:00 on Thursday, Jack the division program manager says to the four members of his team, "Have your proposals ready for discussion by Friday afternoon." What did the employees hear him saying? What did they do as a result? The following day Jack According to USFDA, a combination product is one composed of any combination of a drug and device; biological product and device; drug and biological product called the team members one by one and asked that they come to his office with proposal in hand.
; or drug, device, and biological product and fixed dose combination would include two or more combinations of drug. Examples of combination products may in t he thought the proposals were due next Friday
lude drug-coated devices, drugs packaged with delivery devices in medical kits, and drugs and devices packaged separately but intended to be used together. can do." Obviously something went wrong. Were they listening? Was the message clear? Many will say that Jack was not clear in communicating expectations -- partially true. Don’t underestimate the role of the listener. Whether through verbal or non-v here is enormous increase in the number of combination products entering the market in the recent years. Combination products have proven advantages but fixe erbal cues, it is the listener that actually directs the conversation. In the example Jack said what he wanted to say and with no questions, objections or comments he had no way of knowing that there was any disconnect. Well… not until time had been spent an d dose combinations are still in the process of convincing regulatory authority on their advantages over the single ingredient formulations. Combination pro he was still without the important campaign information. The listener has a responsibility to check in with the person speaking. Not one of the employees asked a question for clarification. Why not? They thought they heard what Jack was saying (assumed) and ucts have become life saving products for the pharmaceutical companies who doesn’t have many innovative molecules in their product pipeline and have been inc understood what he wanted in return. The speaker can have his say but if the listener can not accurately interpret what the speaker is trying to convey there is no communication. The best communicator with great verbal skills can not overcome the failure o easingly used in the product life cycle management. Even the companies having product patents are trying to extend their product life cycle through the combi f a poor listener. Dialogue quickly becomes a monologue. Conversely in a conversation between a great listener and a poor speaker, the listener will work with the speaker to draw out and clarify the message. Think of how many times you have misinterpreted i nation products and maximize the revenues. But the companies involved in this practice are overlooking that they are burdening the patients both economically structions, heard a problem incorrectly, or missed out on business opportunities. Poor listening can lead to challenges in relationships, lack of credibility, lost contacts, inaccurate reporting, rework, dissatisfied customers and lowered productivity. Did y and physically. They need to rightly judge the benefits of the combination products and they have to even look at the risks involved when combining the produ ou know...?
HTTP = HTML link (for blogs, profiles,phorums):
Related Articles:How Packaging Can Transform An Industry Best Home Business if You are Laid Off- Work at Home can be Your New Business for Residual Income
|