Useful Advices
#1 in Business Subscribe Email Print

You are here: Home > Business > Sales Management > Motivating Employees Is Not Rocket Science

Tags

  • innovative
  • various
  • which
  • combination products
  • combination products
  • combination products

  • Links

  • Why Software Development Planning Is So Important
  • Are You Annoying? Update Your Personality
  • Ask Not What You Can Do for the Government; Ask What the Government Can Do for Your Business
  • Useful Advices - Motivating Employees Is Not Rocket Science

    First of all it’s not your job to motivate them. The concept of motivation implies that it is the responsibility of people to motivate themselves. As long as
    According to USFDA, a combination product is one composed of any combination of a drug and device; biological product and device; drug and biological product
    you see it as your responsibility to motivate them, guess what, you will always have to motivate them by finding clever, creative and innovative ways to accompl
    ; or drug, device, and biological product and fixed dose combination would include two or more combinations of drug.

    Examples of combination products may in
    ish this and trust me sooner or later you will tire of this responsibility. It is better to have them understand that their motivation is their responsibility
    lude drug-coated devices, drugs packaged with delivery devices in medical kits, and drugs and devices packaged separately but intended to be used together.

    not yours as their manager. Motivation is an inside-out not an out-side in individual responsibility.

    The role of a manager is only to create a positive motiv
    here is enormous increase in the number of combination products entering the market in the recent years. Combination products have proven advantages but fixe
    ating, validating and empowering motivational climate in which employees are willing to take full responsibility for their own motivation.

    Having said this if
    d dose combinations are still in the process of convincing regulatory authority on their advantages over the single ingredient formulations.

    Combination pro
    you have employees who need constant motivation either they don’t understand the above concept or you need to re-consider their role in your organization.

    Ther
    ucts have become life saving products for the pharmaceutical companies who doesn’t have many innovative molecules in their product pipeline and have been inc
    e are two traditional methods of motivating employees that are being used in thousands of companies by millions of managers to “MOTIVATE” their employees. They
    easingly used in the product life cycle management. Even the companies having product patents are trying to extend their product life cycle through the combi
    are: fear or punishment and reward or incentives. Both of these motivational environments are temporary and appeal to the outside-in need to be motivated.

    Fear
    nation products and maximize the revenues. But the companies involved in this practice are overlooking that they are burdening the patients both economically
    Motivation is based on punishment of some kind from the withdrawal of a privilege to being fired. If fear motivation is the dominant type you or your organiza
    and physically. They need to rightly judge the benefits of the combination products and they have to even look at the risks involved when combining the produ
    tion uses, I will bet you live with a great deal of frustration and poor performance not to mention the negative climate and culture. People can build up an imm
    ts. Some of the combination products were well accepted by physicians while others suffered. Companies involved in development of combination products are fi
    nity to your threats. And if they are no longer concerned about the punishment, these methods just won’t motivate them over the long term. Fear motivation is al
    ding difficulty in defining their combination products and facing various challenges from selecting a combination to marketing it.

    Following aspects would a
    so negative and tends to de-motivate, the opposite of what you are attempting to accomplish.

    Reward or incentive motivation is based on a want or need of the e
    dd to the challenges in developing combination products:

    Which markets to tap where the combination products can do fairly well?
    Which combination prod
    mployee. The problem is, if they don’t want what you are rewarding them with, guess what – it won’t be a motivator. I worked with a client years ago where the
    cts are meaningful and rational?
    Which therapeutic categories to select?
    Which Combinations can address unmet needs of the patients?
    Do combin
    average yearly sales compensation was over $150,000 per employee. The president was frustrated because their potential was in excess of $300,000 a year. No addi
    tions increase the patient compliance?
    What would be the developing cost?
    How to tackle the risks encountered during combination product developmen
    tional incentives would improve performance because each of the employees was satisfied with his or her current compensation levels. So offering them bribes, bo
    t?

    As combination products don't fit into the traditional categories of drugs, medical devices, or biological products, the USFDA is in the process of devel
    nuses or nicer drapes in their office just didn't work to get them to work harder to sell more so they could earn more.

    There is an old saying that says. “You
    ping new procedures for reviewing their safety, efficacy and quality.

    Professional from academic institutions, pharmaceutical industries, health care indust
    can lead a horse to water, but you can’t make him drink.” You can, however, put some salt in his oats to make him a little thirstier.

    The only motivation that
    y and representatives from various regulatory agencies are working out to design the regulatory requirements for manufacture and sale of combination products
    works for the long haul is turning over the responsibility of motivation to the individual. That’s why it is called self-motivation.

    This third type of motiva
    .

    As there is an increasing trend of the combination products companies manufacturing such products should be able to tackle the problems involved in the de
    tion is based on a person’s attitude development. He or she does more or does it better – not because you want them to, threaten them or promise them the moon –
    elopment. They need to be wiser in analyzing the market trends and the regulatory requirements.

    Companies that provide selfless information through particip
    but because they want to.

    The key role of a manager is to hire self-motivated employees, then do as little as possible to get in their way or de-motivate them


    tion in industry events and feedback to regulatory authorities would be able to face the challenges and will be successful in developing combination products

    HTTP = HTML link (for blogs, profiles,phorums):
    <a href="http://www.usefuladvices.org.ua/article/38416/usefuladvices-Motivating-Employees-Is-Not-Rocket-Science.html">Motivating Employees Is Not Rocket Science</a>

    BB link (for phorums):
    [url=http://www.usefuladvices.org.ua/article/38416/usefuladvices-Motivating-Employees-Is-Not-Rocket-Science.html]Motivating Employees Is Not Rocket Science[/url]

    Related Articles:

    Get The Finest Quality Of Brochure Printing In Los Angeles

    Addicted to Praise

    The Cure For A Failing Downline - Earn More

    Bookmark it: del.icio.us digg.com reddit.com netvouz.com google.com yahoo.com technorati.com furl.net bloglines.com socialdust.com ma.gnolia.com newsvine.com slashdot.org simpy.com shadows.com blinklist.com